A Case Against Blogging
Stefan McDaniel makes a case against blogging, or perhaps, a case against the damage blogging does to our respect for words:
Reading [Neil] Postman for the first time last month gave me clearer language to explain my rage against the rise of blogging. For what he says about media can be said about literary forms—they are biased toward certain kinds of content. The blogpost is biased toward speed, brevity, and cleverness. It thus hands the public square over to bullies, sophists, and clowns.
Some of my very astute pro-blog friends have argued that, whatever their drawbacks, blogs create a democratic public space whose occupants are minimally beholden to state and corporate interests. For the discerning reader, entering the blogosphere is just like listening in on a fascinating conversation among free, brilliant interlocutors. The incompleteness, electicism, and so on are characteristic of good conversation.
There is of course some truth in that. There are proportionately few but absolutely many good blogs, and there’s nothing wrong with reading them. For all my young fogeyism I make a point of reading them myself.
But few of the good blogs my friends or I read are popular, and they are all constantly pushed towards superficiality by the ruling imperative of generating traffic.
Furthermore, even good blogging threatens to worsen our already bad relation with the written word. Several excellent bloggers have told me that they find it much harder than they once did either to follow sustained written arguments (especially when not tricked out with flashy rhetoric) or to make such arguments themselves; they have grown impatient with writing that does not meet bloggy criteria.
For starters, I have problems with these sorts of apocalyptic articles, even though I agree with some of their basic points (Derek Powazek’s recent article on SEO marketing is another example of this). In the case of McDaniel’s article, I don’t think there’s any doubt that blogging (and web writing in general) is certainly changing the way we approach words and language, both for better and worse.
As for myself, I’ve always tried to maintain a proper balance of “old” and “new” writing. I try and stay away from many of the tropes and conventions of online writing (including some of the typical blog writing “tips”) while at the same time, trying to optimize my writing for the web medium.
What Is This Place?
Opus is a website masquerading as a blog masquerading as a webzine. It’s where I (Jason Morehead) write about music, movies, art, web design, religion and whatever else interests me at the time (Read More).
Related: I can also be found on Twitter, Facebook, and Flickr.
Hand-Picked Opus
Not sure where to start? Then check out this revolving hand-picked list of some of my favorite articles and reviews.
- Seeing through the eyes of the depraved 6/21/2008
- The Friendly Beasts 12/9/2007
- The Revolutionary Army Of The Infant Jesus 8/18/2006
- Ester Drang Interview 11/3/2005
- Samurai Fiction 7/3/2004
Recent Music Reviews
Recent Movie Reviews
Recent Comments
- RT on Ian
- Owen Moorhead (no relation) on James Cameron, "Avatar", and Pantheism
- Matt on The Return of Captain EO
- Rocky on "Song of Remembering" by The Rentals
- Jason Morehead on "Song of Remembering" by The Rentals
Friends, Allies & Inspiration
- The Grand
- View from the Prairie Box
- Red Bicycle, Inc.
- Looking Closer
- Arts & Faith
- Filmwell
- Twitch
- Elastic Heart
- Raymonn
- Skoolbus 39
- Something Excellent
- Proj
- Long Pauses
- Firespring
- Andy Whitman
- The Search
- The Hurst Review
- Christ and Pop Culture
- This Is Not Entertainment
- TheoFantastique
- Image Journal
- Flickerings
- Disquiet
- PopMatters
- The War Against Silence
- EE Insider
- Godbit Project
- Smashing Magazine








1 Comments
-
Nicholas
2 months, 1 week ago
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.Man, this post reminded me of this story I read the other day on the effect of all our Internet use and literacy:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson
As for myself, after blogging and partaking in Internet writing for quite a long time, I find I have no difficulty following “sustained written arguments”. Instead, I think I have less difficulty in doing so.